Vol.64

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12
• Supplement

Vol.63

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12
• Supplement

Vol.62

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12
• Supplement

Vol.61

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12
• Supplement

Vol.60

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12
• Supplement

Vol.59

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12
• Supplement

Vol.58

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12
• Supplement

Vol.57

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12
• Supplement

Vol.56

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12
• Supplement

Vol.55

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12
• Supplement

Vol.54

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12
• Supplement

Vol.53

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12

Vol.52

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12

Vol.51

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12

Vol.50

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12

Vol.49

• No.1
• No.2/3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12

Vol.48

• No.1
• No.2
• No.3
• No.4
• No.5
• No.6
• No.7
• No.8
• No.9
• No.10
• No.11
• No.12

• Vol.47 to 1
  (Members Only)

• HOME
• Vol.64 No.6
• CLINICA NEUROL, 64: 390−397, 2024
• Vol.64 No.6 contents

Invited Review

Dynamic activity model of movement disorders: a unified view to understand their pathophysiology

Atsushi Nambu, M.D., Ph.D.^1）, Satomi Chiken, Ph.D.^1）2）, Hiromi Sano, Ph.D.^3）, Nobuhiko Hatanaka, D.D.S., Ph.D.^1）2）4） and José A. Obeso, M.D., Ph.D.^5）6）7）

¹⁾Division of System Neurophysiology, National Institute for Physiological Sciences
²⁾Physiological Sciences, SOKENDAI (Graduate University for Advanced Studies)
³⁾Division of Behavioral Neuropharmacology, International Center for Brain Science, Fujita Health University
⁴⁾School of Dentistry, Aichi Gakuin University
⁵⁾HM CINAC (Centro Integral de Neurociencias Abarca Campal), Hospital Universitario HM Puerta del Sur, HM Hospitales
⁶⁾Network Center for Biomedical Research on Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Instituto Carlos III
⁷⁾University CEU-San Pablo

Malfunction of the basal ganglia leads to movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease, dystonia, Huntington's disease, dyskinesia, and hemiballism, but their underlying pathophysiology is still subject to debate. To understand their pathophysiology in a unified manner, we propose the “dynamic activity model”, on the basis of alterations of cortically induced responses in individual nuclei of the basal ganglia. In the normal state, electric stimulation in the motor cortex, mimicking cortical activity during initiation of voluntary movements, evokes a triphasic response consisting of early excitation, inhibition, and late excitation in the output stations of the basal ganglia of monkeys, rodents, and humans. Among three components, cortically induced inhibition, which is mediated by the direct pathway, releases an appropriate movement at an appropriate time by disinhibiting thalamic and cortical activity, whereas early and late excitation, which is mediated by the hyperdirect and indirect pathways, resets on-going cortical activity and stops movements, respectively. Cortically induced triphasic response patterns are systematically altered in various movement disorder models and could well explain the pathophysiology of their motor symptoms. In monkey and mouse models of Parkinson's disease, cortically induced inhibition is reduced and prevents the release of movements, resulting in akinesia/bradykinesia. On the other hand, in a mouse model of dystonia, cortically induced inhibition is enhanced and releases unintended movements, inducing involuntary muscle contractions. Moreover, after blocking the subthalamic nucleus activity in a monkey model of Parkinson's disease, cortically induced inhibition is recovered and enables voluntary movements, explaining the underlying mechanism of stereotactic surgery to ameliorate parkinsonian motor signs. The “dynamic activity model” gives us a more comprehensive view of the pathophysiology underlying motor symptoms of movement disorders and clues for their novel therapies.
Full Text of this Article in Japanese PDF (1351K)

(CLINICA NEUROL, 64: 390−397, 2024)
key words: pathophysiology, Parkinson's disease, movement disorders, basal ganglia

(Received: 8-Dec-23)